The 10 Best Cities For Singles In Utah For 2025


The best cities for singles in Utah are Provo and Orem for 2025 based on Saturday Night Science.

Are you looking for love in Utah?

Or are you just hoping to hook up with a hot Utahan?

Either way, we’ve got you covered here.

If you live in Utah, there’s a pretty good chance there are a lot of singles in your area. The Beehive State has plenty of people over 18 who aren’t married or in a serious relationship.

That’s great news for people who are single and looking to mingle.

So, where are the best cities for singles in Utah? We used Saturday Night Science to find out.


Table Of Contents: Top Ten | Methodology | Summary | Table


The 10 Best Cities For Singles In Utah For 2025

  1. Provo
  2. Orem
  3. Logan
  4. Midvale
  5. Murray
  6. Taylorsville
  7. South Salt Lake
  8. Sandy
  9. Cottonwood Heights
  10. Holladay

Best Cities For Singles In Utah Map

So, what was the best city for singles in Utah? Provo ranks as the best place for singles in Utah if you care about things singles care about, like nightlife, affordable housing, and other singles.

Read below to see how we crunched the numbers and how each city ranked. If you live in or are close to one of these cities and are single, you should probably get out more often.

Just saying.

For more Utah reading, check out:

The 10 Best Cities For Singles In Utah For 2025

Provo, UT

Source: Wikipedia User Creator: Javin Weaver | CC BY-SA 3.0
Overall SnackAbility

7
/10

Population: 114,303
Median Age: 23.7
Married households: 17.0%
Households with kids: 29.5%
More on Provo: Data

Review Of Provo by HomeSnacks User

Racially, culturally, and religiously homogenous.

BYU is terrible and unaccepting of diverging view points.

Orem, UT

Source: Wikipedia User uvuphotos | CC BY 2.0
Overall SnackAbility

8.5
/10

Population: 97,048
Median Age: 26.9
Married households: 22.0%
Households with kids: 38.0%
More on Orem: Data

Review Of Orem by HomeSnacks User

I thought it was a fine town but it’s really run down and since it’s right next to a bustling college town, most of the people who live there are below a certain poverty level that most people are comfortable living around. There seems to be mostly commercial growth, which leaves the residential areas feeling random and it’s driving the prices up but for cheap and under-maintained homes and apartments.

There’s great shopping, restaurants and places for entertainment. I just definitely would never live there.

Logan, UT

Source: Public domain
Overall SnackAbility

8
/10

Population: 53,923
Median Age: 23.8
Married households: 24.0%
Households with kids: 32.4%
More on Logan: Data

Midvale, UT

Source: Wikipedia User CountyLemonade/CL | CC BY 3.0
Overall SnackAbility

7.5
/10

Population: 35,736
Median Age: 32.6
Married households: 20.0%
Households with kids: 28.2%
More on Midvale: Data

Murray, UT

Source: Wikipedia User CountyLemonade/CL | CC BY 3.0
Overall SnackAbility

8
/10

Population: 49,904
Median Age: 38.2
Married households: 25.0%
Households with kids: 25.2%
More on Murray: Data

Taylorsville, UT

Source: Wikipedia User Rover_0 | CC BY 3.0
Overall SnackAbility

7.5
/10

Population: 59,010
Median Age: 34.4
Married households: 23.0%
Households with kids: 35.4%
More on Taylorsville: Data

South Salt Lake, UT

Source: Wikipedia User SSLaker3 | CC BY-SA 3.0
Overall SnackAbility

5
/10

Population: 26,277
Median Age: 31.5
Married households: 10.0%
Households with kids: 23.6%
More on South Salt Lake: Data

Sandy, UT

Source: Wikipedia User Scott Catron from Sandy, Utah, USA | CC BY-SA 2.0
Overall SnackAbility

9
/10

Population: 94,723
Median Age: 36.9
Married households: 26.0%
Households with kids: 37.1%
More on Sandy: Data

Cottonwood Heights, UT

Source: Public domain
Overall SnackAbility

9
/10

Population: 32,984
Median Age: 39.1
Married households: 28.0%
Households with kids: 30.9%
More on Cottonwood Heights: Data

Holladay, UT

Source: Wikipedia User Doug Kerr | CC BY-SA 2.0
Overall SnackAbility

7.5
/10

Population: 31,236
Median Age: 40.1
Married households: 28.0%
Households with kids: 32.0%
More on Holladay: Data

Methodology: How do you determine which city is best for singles in Utah anyways?

To give you the places in Utah which are best for singles to find one another, we used Saturday Night Science to look at a handful of metrics. Of course, we want to measure the type of people who live in each city and make some assumptions about what single people like.

So we researched the internet for a database that contains all that information.

We threw a lot of criteria at this one to get the best, most complete results possible. Using the 2019-2023 American Community Survey Census data produced for the state of Utah, we looked at every single city in the state. We paid particular attention to:

  • Population density
  • % of population that’s male vs. female (closer to a 50-50 ratio is better)
  • % of households with kids
  • Median age
  • Number of unmarried people in each city

We then gave each city a “Singles Score.”

The higher the score, the better the city is for singles to find one another. We also limited our results to cities with over 10,000 people. For Utah, that meant a total of 58 cities.

We updated this article for 2025. This is our tenth time ranking the best cities for singles in Utah.

Read on to see why Provo is the talk of the town while Mapleton is probably a bit on the bland side.

Summary: The Best Cities for Singles in Utah for 2025

If you’re looking for a breakdown of cities in Utah ranked by criteria that most agree make a place a great spot for finding a single person (and potentially love), this is an accurate list.

The best cities for singles in Utah are Provo, Orem, Logan, Midvale, Murray, Taylorsville, South Salt Lake, Sandy, Cottonwood Heights, and Holladay.

Here’s a look at the most boring cities in Utah according to the data:

  1. Mapleton
  2. Pleasant View
  3. Hyrum

For more Utah reading, check out:

Best Cities For Singles In Utah

Rank City Population Median Age % Married Households % Households /w Kids
1 Provo, UT 114,303 23.7 17.0% 29.5%
2 Orem, UT 97,048 26.9 22.0% 38.0%
3 Logan, UT 53,923 23.8 24.0% 32.4%
4 Midvale, UT 35,736 32.6 20.0% 28.2%
5 Murray, UT 49,904 38.2 25.0% 25.2%
6 Taylorsville, UT 59,010 34.4 23.0% 35.4%
7 South Salt Lake, UT 26,277 31.5 10.0% 23.6%
8 Sandy, UT 94,723 36.9 26.0% 37.1%
9 Cottonwood Heights, UT 32,984 39.1 28.0% 30.9%
10 Holladay, UT 31,236 40.1 28.0% 32.0%
11 Roy, UT 39,021 32.7 33.0% 41.2%
12 Layton, UT 82,512 32.5 29.0% 40.2%
13 Clearfield, UT 32,895 30.1 23.0% 43.7%
14 American Fork, UT 35,312 27.8 31.0% 41.8%
15 South Ogden, UT 17,563 33.1 32.0% 35.9%
16 Pleasant Grove, UT 37,544 28.2 31.0% 42.9%
17 Springville, UT 35,474 28.0 30.0% 47.4%
18 Ogden, UT 86,973 33.3 20.0% 32.9%
19 Bountiful, UT 45,093 32.4 36.0% 35.7%
20 Vineyard, UT 13,510 24.8 23.0% 39.4%
21 North Logan, UT 11,228 29.8 24.0% 36.2%
22 West Jordan, UT 116,277 33.1 29.0% 43.7%
23 Lehi, UT 81,039 26.6 31.0% 53.2%
24 Heber, UT 17,438 28.4 28.0% 52.0%
25 Syracuse, UT 34,009 28.7 36.0% 56.7%
26 St. George, UT 99,184 37.9 24.0% 32.5%
27 North Salt Lake, UT 23,239 32.3 31.0% 45.4%
28 Vernal, UT 10,254 29.3 27.0% 43.4%
29 Draper, UT 50,159 33.7 27.0% 39.1%
30 Spanish Fork, UT 43,632 27.2 37.0% 53.4%
31 Farmington, UT 24,934 31.7 35.0% 47.5%
32 Centerville, UT 16,692 39.0 40.0% 36.8%
33 Highland, UT 19,625 26.2 28.0% 60.6%
34 Herriman, UT 57,336 28.8 33.0% 54.9%
35 Payson, UT 22,205 29.3 34.0% 43.1%
36 Smithfield, UT 14,033 28.3 42.0% 52.8%
37 Tooele, UT 37,265 32.8 36.0% 42.0%
38 South Jordan, UT 80,331 35.8 35.0% 40.3%
39 West Haven, UT 19,977 29.6 28.0% 50.4%
40 Saratoga Springs, UT 44,070 23.3 34.0% 67.2%
41 Eagle Mountain, UT 49,514 22.1 39.0% 72.6%
42 Santaquin, UT 15,391 27.1 44.0% 64.3%
43 Lindon, UT 11,594 30.0 31.0% 43.7%
44 North Ogden, UT 21,473 33.4 36.0% 46.9%
45 Bluffdale, UT 18,168 31.2 36.0% 48.1%
46 West Point, UT 11,559 35.3 38.0% 42.8%
47 Kaysville, UT 32,861 32.3 42.0% 49.5%
48 Clinton, UT 23,492 33.0 36.0% 47.2%
49 Grantsville, UT 13,637 29.5 37.0% 54.4%
50 Riverton, UT 44,944 34.7 41.0% 47.3%
51 Washington, UT 30,686 38.8 30.0% 34.8%
52 Hurricane, UT 21,677 41.1 29.0% 29.4%
53 Woods Cross, UT 11,490 30.4 40.0% 48.2%
54 Tremonton, UT 10,886 27.9 36.0% 45.6%
55 Alpine, UT 10,272 36.7 32.0% 41.4%
56 Hyrum, UT 10,022 30.2 45.0% 45.5%
57 Pleasant View, UT 11,104 36.3 35.0% 45.7%
58 Mapleton, UT 12,340 31.4 35.0% 51.5%
About Chris Kolmar

Chris Kolmar has been in the real estate business for almost ten years now. He originally worked for Movoto Real Estate as the director of marketing before founding HomeSnacks.

He believes the key to finding the right place to live comes down to looking at the data, reading about things to do, and, most importantly, checking it out yourself before you move.

If you've been looking for a place to live in the past several years, you've probably stumbled upon his writing already.

You can find out more about him on LinkedIn or his website.