Are you looking for love in Washington?
Or are you just hoping to hook up with a hot Washingtonian?
Either way, we’ve got you covered here.
If you live in Washington, there’s a pretty good chance there are a lot of singles in your area. The Evergreen State has plenty of people over 18 who aren’t married or in a serious relationship.
That’s great news for people who are single and looking to mingle.
So, where are the best cities for singles in Washington? We used Saturday Night Science to find out.
Table Of Contents: Top Ten | Methodology | Summary | Table
The 10 Best Cities For Singles In Washington For 2025
So, what was the best city for singles in Washington? Pullman ranks as the best place for singles in Washington if you care about things singles care about, like nightlife, affordable housing, and other singles.
Read below to see how we crunched the numbers and how each city ranked. If you live in or are close to one of these cities and are single, you should probably get out more often.
Just saying.
For more Washington reading, check out:
- Best Places To Live In Washington
- Cheapest Places To Live In Washington
- Most Dangerous Cities In Washington
The 10 Best Cities For Singles In Washington For 2025
/10
Population: 31,939
Median Age: 22.8
Married households: 7.0%
Households with kids: 18.4%
More on Pullman: Data
/10
Population: 741,440
Median Age: 35.5
Married households: 9.0%
Households with kids: 17.9%
More on Seattle: Data
here no crime and child do play well,
living things to be happy in all the day when spend here
/10
Population: 105,279
Median Age: 36.5
Married households: 12.0%
Households with kids: 29.8%
More on Renton: Data
/10
Population: 192,696
Median Age: 37.5
Married households: 8.0%
Households with kids: 27.6%
More on Vancouver: Data
I grew up and currently live in Vancouver, WA. It is a suburb that seems like a small town at times. It is a calmer city than Portland with all the conveniences and walking trails, a nice waterfront, and a historical fort.
Watch out for congested roads and drivers who do not know what they are doing.
/10
Population: 220,482
Median Age: 37.3
Married households: 16.0%
Households with kids: 26.8%
More on Tacoma: Data
Lots to do and tons of beautiful scenery. The city is generally pretty safe and people are very friendly.
There are lots of good restaurants that are fun to go and check out on weekends. Likewise, there are lots of small craft breweries. I don’t really have much bad to say other than the fact that downtown all the stoplight are right at the top of the hills for some reason. It makes it very easy to accidentally roll backwards.
/10
Population: 91,614
Median Age: 38.2
Married households: 13.0%
Households with kids: 28.3%
More on Kirkland: Data
/10
Population: 92,367
Median Age: 34.5
Married households: 13.0%
Households with kids: 19.1%
More on Bellingham: Data
EVERYTHING IS PRETTY SAFE. ALMOST EVERYONE IS FRIENDLY, NOT ALL OF THEM THOUGH. THE TRAFFIC IS OK. THE WEATHER IS PRETTY COLD COMPARED TO OTHER PLACES. IT’S NICE AND COOL RIGHT NOW WHICH IS SUPER COMFORTABLE
IT DOESN’T HAVE THAT MUCH PLACE TO GO. IT’S KINDA BORING COMPARED TO BIG CITIES. I THINK THAT IS WHY IT’S PRETTY QUIET AND NICE AND SAFE. IT’S NOT COMPLICATED COMPARED TO BIG CITIES. THAT IS A REASON WHY I LOVE BELLINGHAM
/10
Population: 99,232
Median Age: 37.6
Married households: 12.0%
Households with kids: 32.5%
More on Federal Way: Data
/10
Population: 229,228
Median Age: 37.2
Married households: 18.0%
Households with kids: 25.6%
More on Spokane: Data
Property crime is terrible, violent crime is also on the rise, and the local DA office and judges who run the justice system play “catch & release” without ever punishing any criminals..
I’m honestly surprised that Spokane didn’t hit #1 and Fife did.
/10
Population: 18,913
Median Age: 26.7
Married households: 16.0%
Households with kids: 21.2%
More on Ellensburg: Data
Methodology: How do you determine which city is best for singles in Washington anyways?
To give you the places in Washington which are best for singles to find one another, we used Saturday Night Science to look at a handful of metrics. Of course, we want to measure the type of people who live in each city and make some assumptions about what single people like.
So we researched the internet for a database that contains all that information.
We threw a lot of criteria at this one to get the best, most complete results possible. Using the 2019-2023 American Community Survey Census data produced for the state of Washington, we looked at every single city in the state. We paid particular attention to:
- Population density
- % of population that’s male vs. female (closer to a 50-50 ratio is better)
- % of households with kids
- Median age
- Number of unmarried people in each city
We then gave each city a “Singles Score.”
The higher the score, the better the city is for singles to find one another. We also limited our results to cities with over 10,000 people. For Washington, that meant a total of 90 cities.
We updated this article for 2025. This is our tenth time ranking the best cities for singles in Washington.
Read on to see why Pullman is the talk of the town while Edgewood is probably a bit on the bland side.
Summary: The Best Cities for Singles in Washington for 2025
If you’re looking for a breakdown of cities in Washington ranked by criteria that most agree make a place a great spot for finding a single person (and potentially love), this is an accurate list.
The best cities for singles in Washington are Pullman, Seattle, Renton, Vancouver, Tacoma, Kirkland, Bellingham, Federal Way, Spokane, and Ellensburg.
Here’s a look at the most boring cities in Washington according to the data:
- Edgewood
- Liberty Lake
- West Richland
For more Washington reading, check out:
- Best Places To Raise A Family In Washington
- Safest Places In Washington
- Worst Places To Live In Washington
Best Cities For Singles In Washington
| Rank | City | Population | Median Age | % Married Households | % Households /w Kids |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pullman, WA | 31,939 | 22.8 | 7.0% | 18.4% |
| 2 | Seattle, WA | 741,440 | 35.5 | 9.0% | 17.9% |
| 3 | Renton, WA | 105,279 | 36.5 | 12.0% | 29.8% |
| 4 | Vancouver, WA | 192,696 | 37.5 | 8.0% | 27.6% |
| 5 | Tacoma, WA | 220,482 | 37.3 | 16.0% | 26.8% |
| 6 | Kirkland, WA | 91,614 | 38.2 | 13.0% | 28.3% |
| 7 | Bellingham, WA | 92,367 | 34.5 | 13.0% | 19.1% |
| 8 | Federal Way, WA | 99,232 | 37.6 | 12.0% | 32.5% |
| 9 | Spokane, WA | 229,228 | 37.2 | 18.0% | 25.6% |
| 10 | Ellensburg, WA | 18,913 | 26.7 | 16.0% | 21.2% |
| 11 | Bellevue, WA | 151,199 | 38.3 | 8.0% | 29.6% |
| 12 | Mountlake Terrace, WA | 21,419 | 38.2 | 14.0% | 23.3% |
| 13 | Lynnwood, WA | 40,953 | 39.2 | 11.0% | 26.3% |
| 14 | Lakewood, WA | 63,034 | 36.3 | 11.0% | 28.5% |
| 15 | Issaquah, WA | 39,472 | 37.2 | 10.0% | 31.3% |
| 16 | Shoreline, WA | 59,280 | 42.1 | 17.0% | 27.5% |
| 17 | Kent, WA | 135,015 | 35.3 | 11.0% | 36.0% |
| 18 | Cheney, WA | 12,830 | 23.9 | 12.0% | 23.1% |
| 19 | Redmond, WA | 75,721 | 35.0 | 5.0% | 32.0% |
| 20 | Yakima, WA | 96,810 | 34.0 | 18.0% | 35.6% |
| 21 | Everett, WA | 111,083 | 37.1 | 13.0% | 27.4% |
| 22 | Grandview, WA | 11,042 | 28.1 | 8.0% | 48.3% |
| 23 | Lacey, WA | 57,088 | 37.7 | 11.0% | 27.8% |
| 24 | Fife, WA | 10,902 | 31.9 | 12.0% | 38.1% |
| 25 | Olympia, WA | 55,583 | 39.2 | 11.0% | 25.2% |
| 26 | Battle Ground, WA | 21,293 | 33.7 | 12.0% | 40.0% |
| 27 | Auburn, WA | 85,455 | 35.7 | 15.0% | 35.0% |
| 28 | Newcastle, WA | 12,945 | 37.4 | 12.0% | 32.2% |
| 29 | Wenatchee, WA | 35,502 | 36.0 | 20.0% | 32.3% |
| 30 | Oak Harbor, WA | 24,396 | 31.8 | 7.0% | 38.1% |
| 31 | Bremerton, WA | 44,531 | 33.0 | 10.0% | 26.3% |
| 32 | Kennewick, WA | 84,389 | 35.8 | 17.0% | 33.1% |
| 33 | Tukwila, WA | 21,479 | 35.0 | 10.0% | 28.6% |
| 34 | Des Moines, WA | 32,545 | 37.5 | 14.0% | 29.9% |
| 35 | Sunnyside, WA | 16,329 | 27.2 | 12.0% | 48.3% |
| 36 | Pasco, WA | 78,446 | 30.2 | 14.0% | 50.4% |
| 37 | Seatac, WA | 31,143 | 36.8 | 9.0% | 30.9% |
| 38 | Burien, WA | 51,331 | 39.8 | 14.0% | 29.9% |
| 39 | Mukilteo, WA | 21,312 | 44.3 | 16.0% | 30.3% |
| 40 | Spokane Valley, WA | 105,460 | 37.6 | 20.0% | 28.2% |
| 41 | Puyallup, WA | 42,642 | 37.2 | 18.0% | 29.2% |
| 42 | Marysville, WA | 71,570 | 37.4 | 21.0% | 32.2% |
| 43 | Mill Creek, WA | 20,846 | 38.8 | 18.0% | 33.3% |
| 44 | Aberdeen, WA | 17,040 | 36.9 | 16.0% | 30.2% |
| 45 | Lake Stevens, WA | 39,500 | 34.8 | 22.0% | 47.2% |
| 46 | Lake Forest Park, WA | 13,356 | 42.8 | 18.0% | 28.0% |
| 47 | Shelton, WA | 10,619 | 31.6 | 14.0% | 34.2% |
| 48 | Yelm, WA | 10,618 | 30.6 | 11.0% | 49.6% |
| 49 | Mount Vernon, WA | 35,312 | 36.1 | 18.0% | 35.3% |
| 50 | Woodinville, WA | 13,440 | 39.1 | 15.0% | 31.0% |
| 51 | Bothell, WA | 48,610 | 38.0 | 17.0% | 35.7% |
| 52 | Sedro-Woolley, WA | 12,633 | 35.1 | 22.0% | 35.3% |
| 53 | Walla Walla, WA | 33,766 | 38.1 | 16.0% | 27.1% |
| 54 | Longview, WA | 37,836 | 39.1 | 16.0% | 26.6% |
| 55 | Kenmore, WA | 23,594 | 38.7 | 15.0% | 31.1% |
| 56 | Port Angeles, WA | 20,087 | 41.5 | 15.0% | 21.8% |
| 57 | Centralia, WA | 18,457 | 37.8 | 14.0% | 28.8% |
| 58 | Port Orchard, WA | 16,398 | 32.9 | 13.0% | 40.1% |
| 59 | Enumclaw, WA | 12,663 | 38.9 | 26.0% | 27.2% |
| 60 | Sammamish, WA | 66,375 | 39.4 | 9.0% | 52.4% |
| 61 | Anacortes, WA | 17,837 | 49.5 | 18.0% | 24.2% |
| 62 | Arlington, WA | 20,599 | 37.1 | 24.0% | 35.4% |
| 63 | Edmonds, WA | 42,783 | 46.3 | 21.0% | 23.6% |
| 64 | Maple Valley, WA | 28,121 | 36.5 | 19.0% | 52.7% |
| 65 | Airway Heights, WA | 10,766 | 32.9 | 11.0% | 33.0% |
| 66 | Snohomish, WA | 10,177 | 42.9 | 19.0% | 29.6% |
| 67 | Richland, WA | 61,912 | 36.4 | 17.0% | 30.0% |
| 68 | Mercer Island, WA | 25,282 | 45.8 | 14.0% | 32.6% |
| 69 | Bonney Lake, WA | 22,776 | 35.4 | 26.0% | 48.1% |
| 70 | Covington, WA | 20,957 | 37.4 | 20.0% | 39.8% |
| 71 | Port Townsend, WA | 10,290 | 59.4 | 12.0% | 15.4% |
| 72 | Moses Lake, WA | 25,594 | 32.3 | 21.0% | 34.5% |
| 73 | East Wenatchee, WA | 14,114 | 35.4 | 23.0% | 44.4% |
| 74 | University Place, WA | 34,850 | 38.9 | 20.0% | 32.8% |
| 75 | Camas, WA | 26,779 | 40.6 | 12.0% | 43.4% |
| 76 | Kelso, WA | 12,697 | 38.4 | 22.0% | 29.3% |
| 77 | Washougal, WA | 16,945 | 38.7 | 14.0% | 36.9% |
| 78 | Lynden, WA | 16,025 | 35.9 | 24.0% | 32.2% |
| 79 | Sumner, WA | 10,674 | 35.1 | 18.0% | 32.6% |
| 80 | Monroe, WA | 19,696 | 35.1 | 20.0% | 40.6% |
| 81 | Ferndale, WA | 15,447 | 33.6 | 19.0% | 42.0% |
| 82 | Tumwater, WA | 26,519 | 38.1 | 20.0% | 25.9% |
| 83 | Ridgefield, WA | 12,576 | 34.9 | 14.0% | 43.5% |
| 84 | Snoqualmie, WA | 13,750 | 37.7 | 19.0% | 55.9% |
| 85 | Bainbridge Island, WA | 24,607 | 49.0 | 16.0% | 30.7% |
| 86 | Gig Harbor, WA | 12,202 | 47.6 | 18.0% | 23.7% |
| 87 | Poulsbo, WA | 11,962 | 43.2 | 19.0% | 30.8% |
| 88 | West Richland, WA | 17,126 | 35.5 | 25.0% | 45.4% |
| 89 | Liberty Lake, WA | 12,435 | 37.4 | 23.0% | 39.0% |
| 90 | Edgewood, WA | 12,683 | 38.8 | 21.0% | 38.4% |